xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 2/5] xfs: cleanup ->sync_fs

To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] xfs: cleanup ->sync_fs
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 16:11:27 -0400
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4A07141A.5060303@xxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20090426140305.113371000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090426140707.713299000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4A07141A.5060303@xxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 12:51:22PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Is it worth keeping a comment about this still being similar to the
> freeze path?  (xfs_quiesce_data)

Don't think so.  The commonality is in xfs_quiesce_data, and both
calling this functions for the majority of the work makes that quite
obvious.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>