[Top] [All Lists]

Re: EXT vs XFS at 80% filled filesystem

To: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: EXT vs XFS at 80% filled filesystem
From: Michael Monnerie <michael.monnerie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 19:28:38 +0200
In-reply-to: <49F9565E.40804@xxxxxxxxx>
Organization: it-management http://it-management.at
References: <49F9565E.40804@xxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: KMail/1.10.3 (Linux/; KDE/4.1.3; x86_64; ; )
On Donnerstag 30 April 2009 Milind Dumbare wrote:
> I have heard of XFS's performance is not good as compared to EXT3
> when the filesystem(disk) is 80% filled with data. Is it true? I have
> went through lots of performance documents of both XFS and EXT3 but
> could not find such performance benchmarking (for 80% full
> filesystems).
> Any numbers or pointers to other documents are appreciated.

Never heard that before. Where did you hear this?

mfg zmi
// Michael Monnerie, Ing.BSc    -----      http://it-management.at
// Tel: 0660 / 415 65 31                      .network.your.ideas.
// PGP Key:         "curl -s http://zmi.at/zmi.asc | gpg --import"
// Fingerprint: AC19 F9D5 36ED CD8A EF38  500E CE14 91F7 1C12 09B4
// Keyserver: wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net                  Key-ID: 1C1209B4

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>