| To: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: EXT vs XFS at 80% filled filesystem |
| From: | Michael Monnerie <michael.monnerie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 30 Apr 2009 19:28:38 +0200 |
| In-reply-to: | <49F9565E.40804@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | it-management http://it-management.at |
| References: | <49F9565E.40804@xxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | KMail/1.10.3 (Linux/2.6.29.1-ZMI; KDE/4.1.3; x86_64; ; ) |
On Donnerstag 30 April 2009 Milind Dumbare wrote: > I have heard of XFS's performance is not good as compared to EXT3 > when the filesystem(disk) is 80% filled with data. Is it true? I have > went through lots of performance documents of both XFS and EXT3 but > could not find such performance benchmarking (for 80% full > filesystems). > > Any numbers or pointers to other documents are appreciated. Never heard that before. Where did you hear this? mfg zmi -- // Michael Monnerie, Ing.BSc ----- http://it-management.at // Tel: 0660 / 415 65 31 .network.your.ideas. // PGP Key: "curl -s http://zmi.at/zmi.asc | gpg --import" // Fingerprint: AC19 F9D5 36ED CD8A EF38 500E CE14 91F7 1C12 09B4 // Keyserver: wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net Key-ID: 1C1209B4 |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Sometimes df is not updated after remove within xfs via nfs., hgichon |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: EXT vs XFS at 80% filled filesystem, Theodore Tso |
| Previous by Thread: | EXT vs XFS at 80% filled filesystem, Milind Dumbare |
| Next by Thread: | Re: EXT vs XFS at 80% filled filesystem, Theodore Tso |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |