|To:||Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>|
|Subject:||Re: [PATCH 1/2] xfs: a couple getbmap cleanups|
|From:||Felix Blyakher <felixb@xxxxxxx>|
|Date:||Wed, 29 Apr 2009 10:02:11 -0500|
|References:||<20090224133858.GB15820@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <9EF64CF3-FDFC-4777-94A5-7295E827ABA4@xxxxxxx> <20090409171135.GA25303@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <6F8D4AC9-D76A-43FC-AA5C-78C86A12E244@xxxxxxx> <20090429145048.GA15558@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>|
On Apr 29, 2009, at 9:50 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 09:40:40AM -0500, Felix Blyakher wrote:On Apr 9, 2009, at 12:11 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 07:57:48PM -0500, Felix Blyakher wrote:Shouldn't we set error to ENOMEM here?Yes, good catch.Christoph, do you want to repost this patch with that change?Yeah, I added it long ago.
I must have missed your updated patch.
Below is the updated version. I've been running xfsqa on it quite a bit.
Applied to the tree. Thanks, Felix
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||[XFS updates] XFS development tree branch, master, updated. v2.6.28-rc3-20851-g4be4a00, xfs|
|Next by Date:||Re: [PATCH 1/2] xfs: a couple getbmap cleanups, Christoph Hellwig|
|Previous by Thread:||Re: [PATCH 1/2] xfs: a couple getbmap cleanups, Christoph Hellwig|
|Next by Thread:||Re: [PATCH 1/2] xfs: a couple getbmap cleanups, Christoph Hellwig|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|