xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Oops at xfs_bmbt_get_startoff in SLES 10 2.6.16

To: kevin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Oops at xfs_bmbt_get_startoff in SLES 10 2.6.16
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 21:16:55 -0500
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <53630.24.80.224.145.1240361692.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <64323.24.80.224.145.1236883814.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <49B9611F.5040009@xxxxxxxxxxx> <58707.24.80.224.145.1236899620.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <53630.24.80.224.145.1240361692.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Macintosh/20090302)
Kevin Jamieson wrote:
> On Thu, March 12, 2009 4:13 pm, Kevin Jamieson wrote:
>> On Thu, March 12, 2009 12:23 pm, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>>
>>> For SLES that usually is the best route...
>>>
>>> However, http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2009-02/msg00220.html looks
>>> applicable... don't think it ever got merged though.
>>>
>>> perhaps you could test it?
>> Thanks, Eric. I will test Lachlan's patch on our system.
> 
> To follow this up, since applying the patch from the above thread there
> have been no re-occurrences of the issue on our test servers over the past
> month.

And you hit it pretty reliably before, right?  Sounds like we need to
give that a pretty strong eyeball and get it merged, perhaps.

-Eric

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>