| To: | kevin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Oops at xfs_bmbt_get_startoff in SLES 10 2.6.16 |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 21 Apr 2009 21:16:55 -0500 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <53630.24.80.224.145.1240361692.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <64323.24.80.224.145.1236883814.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <49B9611F.5040009@xxxxxxxxxxx> <58707.24.80.224.145.1236899620.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <53630.24.80.224.145.1240361692.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Macintosh/20090302) |
Kevin Jamieson wrote: > On Thu, March 12, 2009 4:13 pm, Kevin Jamieson wrote: >> On Thu, March 12, 2009 12:23 pm, Eric Sandeen wrote: >> >>> For SLES that usually is the best route... >>> >>> However, http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2009-02/msg00220.html looks >>> applicable... don't think it ever got merged though. >>> >>> perhaps you could test it? >> Thanks, Eric. I will test Lachlan's patch on our system. > > To follow this up, since applying the patch from the above thread there > have been no re-occurrences of the issue on our test servers over the past > month. And you hit it pretty reliably before, right? Sounds like we need to give that a pretty strong eyeball and get it merged, perhaps. -Eric |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Oops at xfs_bmbt_get_startoff in SLES 10 2.6.16, Kevin Jamieson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Oops at xfs_bmbt_get_startoff in SLES 10 2.6.16, Felix Blyakher |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Oops at xfs_bmbt_get_startoff in SLES 10 2.6.16, Kevin Jamieson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Oops at xfs_bmbt_get_startoff in SLES 10 2.6.16, Felix Blyakher |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |