| To: | kevin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Oops at xfs_bmbt_get_startoff in SLES 10 2.6.16 |
| From: | "Kevin Jamieson" <kevin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 21 Apr 2009 17:54:52 -0700 (PDT) |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Importance: | Normal |
| In-reply-to: | <58707.24.80.224.145.1236899620.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <64323.24.80.224.145.1236883814.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <49B9611F.5040009@xxxxxxxxxxx> <58707.24.80.224.145.1236899620.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | kevin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | SquirrelMail/1.4.9a |
On Thu, March 12, 2009 4:13 pm, Kevin Jamieson wrote: > On Thu, March 12, 2009 12:23 pm, Eric Sandeen wrote: > >> For SLES that usually is the best route... >> >> However, http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2009-02/msg00220.html looks >> applicable... don't think it ever got merged though. >> >> perhaps you could test it? > > Thanks, Eric. I will test Lachlan's patch on our system. To follow this up, since applying the patch from the above thread there have been no re-occurrences of the issue on our test servers over the past month. Regards, Kevin |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: fsck.xfs proposed improvements, Russell Cattelan |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Oops at xfs_bmbt_get_startoff in SLES 10 2.6.16, Eric Sandeen |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH] make lazy-count=1 the default, Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Oops at xfs_bmbt_get_startoff in SLES 10 2.6.16, Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |