| To: | Felix Blyakher <felixb@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] xfs: add more checks to superblock validation |
| From: | "Josef 'Jeff' Sipek" <jeffpc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 21 Apr 2009 12:52:18 -0400 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <3296B35F-1364-4E7B-856B-041AF746BFFC@xxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1240002765-20279-1-git-send-email-felixb@xxxxxxx> <20090418050544.GQ3709@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <81FBAD0F-AE2A-4780-BC8B-135C4CCE8D3A@xxxxxxx> <20090419181410.GS3709@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3296B35F-1364-4E7B-856B-041AF746BFFC@xxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 10:47:30AM -0500, Felix Blyakher wrote: ... >> This makes me believe that the author >> should include a s-o-b line as well. >> >> So, for example, whenever _I_ send a patch that I authored, I have >> both a From and a s-o-b. > > That seems redundant based on the following excerpt from the > SubmittingPatches: > > If the "from" line is missing, > then the "From:" line from the email header will be used to determine > the patch author in the changelog. If you look at the "sign your work" section in that doc, the example it provides shows the original patch author having a s-o-b as well. ;) Anyway, enough of this...time to hack on xfs some more :) Jeff. -- *NOTE: This message is ROT-13 encrypted twice for extra protection* |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] xfs: add more checks to superblock validation, Felix Blyakher |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH] xfstests: filter out imaxpct value in test 096, Eric Sandeen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] xfs: add more checks to superblock validation, Felix Blyakher |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] xfs: add more checks to superblock validation, Christoph Hellwig |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |