| To: | Felix Blyakher <felixb@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 2/2] xfs: fix getbmap vs mmap deadlock |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 9 Apr 2009 13:14:12 -0400 |
| Cc: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <2B47193B-9486-4500-80C4-E96750BEA54B@xxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20090224133902.GC15820@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <2B47193B-9486-4500-80C4-E96750BEA54B@xxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 07:42:57PM -0500, Felix Blyakher wrote: > Actually with the patch we either get all requested extents, or none > if we fail to get memory for them. > Should we teach the callers to expect ENOMEM and repeat the call > to xfs_getbmap with smaller number of extents? The problem with any of that is that we don't actually get the exact extent list but always a racy version. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 1/2] xfs: a couple getbmap cleanups, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 56/56] xfs: Remove void casts, Felix Blyakher |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 2/2] xfs: fix getbmap vs mmap deadlock, Felix Blyakher |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 2/2] xfs: fix getbmap vs mmap deadlock, Felix Blyakher |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |