xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [patch] fix parallel build failures in xfsprogs-3.0.0

To: Mike Frysinger <vapier@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [patch] fix parallel build failures in xfsprogs-3.0.0
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 14:31:56 -0400
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@xxxxxxx>, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>, nathans@xxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <200903271231.01055.vapier@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <200902240010.25434.vapier@xxxxxxxxxx> <200903081409.28808.agruen@xxxxxxx> <20090327160204.GA9306@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200903271231.01055.vapier@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 12:30:59PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Friday 27 March 2009 12:02:04 Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > I did some make dist and build the tarball tests with
> > acl,attr,xfsprogs & co.
> >
> > We still run libtoolize, aclocal and autoconf when building a clean
> > tree.  I wonder if we should just get rid of the whole configure target
> > and require a manual ./configure like most tools?
> 
> `make dist` should produce a tarball that, when unpacked, people can run:
> ./configure && make && make install

Yes.  The added complication is that the various xfs-cmds derived tools
also run ./configure from a default target make which complicates the
build system.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>