| To: | Raz <raziebe@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: How to configure 36 disks ? |
| From: | Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 23 Mar 2009 15:12:57 +0100 |
| Cc: | linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Linux RAID Mailing List <linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-aio@xxxxxxxxx, "linux-ide@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-ide@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <5d96567b0903230659t734677a3pb4fd77cccb54008b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | Intellique |
| References: | <5d96567b0903230659t734677a3pb4fd77cccb54008b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Le Mon, 23 Mar 2009 15:59:47 +0200 Raz <raziebe@xxxxxxxxx> écrivait: > 1. redundancy. fair. less likely three disks will break in a single > raid 2. performance. bad. > 3. modularity. yes. grows > 4. Size 24TB I don't understand why you'd have a bad performance here. I usually notice a very slight difference between LVM and linux-raid raid0 in all practical benchmarks. Did you use LVM striping capability? You may have to adjust readahead (using blockdev --setra) on each device /dev/dm-X and /dev/md-X) to achieve optimal performance. -- ---------------------------------------- Emmanuel Florac | Intellique ---------------------------------------- |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | How to configure 36 disks ?, Raz |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: How to configure 36 disks ?, Bill Davidsen |
| Previous by Thread: | How to configure 36 disks ?, Raz |
| Next by Thread: | Re: How to configure 36 disks ?, Bill Davidsen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |