xfs
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [PATCH 1/2] [XFS] Validate log feature fields correctly

from [Christoph Hellwig] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] [XFS] Validate log feature fields correctly
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 06:50:34 -0400
In-reply-to: <20090316104904.GK26138@disturbed>
References: <1237116342-25701-1-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1237116342-25701-2-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090315151546.GB7145@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090316104904.GK26138@disturbed>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) 
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 09:49:04PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> I just find large numbers easier to parse in hex, especially as
> we are expecting power-of-2 type numbers to come out of this.
> I'll change it....

True, the power of two would be an argument for hex.  Feel free to keep
it.
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [PATCH 1/2] [XFS] Validate log feature fields correctly, Dave Chinner
Next by Date:  Re: [PATCH 1/5] [XFS] Use xfs_sync_inodes() for device flushing, Dave Chinner
Previous by Thread:  Re: [PATCH 1/2] [XFS] Validate log feature fields correctly, Dave Chinner
Next by Thread:  [PATCH 2/2] [XFS] Fix double free of inode, Dave Chinner
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]