xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: xfs_force_shutdown called from file fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c

To: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: xfs_force_shutdown called from file fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c
From: Michael Monnerie <michael.monnerie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 12:51:23 +0100
In-reply-to: <1235556051.17569.4.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: it-management http://it-management.at
References: <1235480661.17293.28.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090224224636.GF26138@disturbed> <1235556051.17569.4.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: KMail/1.10.3 (Linux/2.6.27.13-ZMI; KDE/4.1.3; x86_64; ; )
On Mittwoch 25 Februar 2009 Federico Sevilla III wrote:
> What would be the "community endorsed" approach to using our favorite
> file system on CentOS 5? Would you recommend we go with the
> CentOSPlus kernels instead?

We run openSUSE, but many servers with a vanilla kernel. So you can 
upgrade whenever you like. Currently, 2.6.28.x is the newest version.

Problem could be that CentOS relies on a patched kernel in some place (I 
don't use it so don't know), but if that doesn't hit you, it doesn't 
matter. For example, openSUSE kernels support a nice graphical boot 
instead of the text, but we don't need that.
You must also take care of kernel bugs and updates yourself from the 
moment you use your own compiled kernel.

mfg zmi
-- 
// Michael Monnerie, Ing.BSc    -----      http://it-management.at
// Tel: 0660 / 415 65 31                      .network.your.ideas.
// PGP Key:         "curl -s http://zmi.at/zmi.asc | gpg --import"
// Fingerprint: AC19 F9D5 36ED CD8A EF38  500E CE14 91F7 1C12 09B4
// Keyserver: wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net                  Key-ID: 1C1209B4

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>