xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [patch] fix parallel build failures in xfsprogs-3.0.0

To: Mike Frysinger <vapier@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [patch] fix parallel build failures in xfsprogs-3.0.0
From: Felix Blyakher <felixb@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 09:14:13 -0600
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <200902240953.56992.vapier@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <200902240010.25434.vapier@xxxxxxxxxx> <200902240221.44184.vapier@xxxxxxxxxx> <20090224131523.GA1579@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200902240953.56992.vapier@xxxxxxxxxx>
On Feb 24, 2009, at 8:53 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:

the xfs.org wiki talks about git trees on sgi.com,

Yes, they're still there.

but some of them are old
and/or moved (like the xfs-cmds one) ...

xfs-cmds was split into separate repos for xfsprogs, xfsdump,
and dmapi. And that info is on xfs.org. Here is the excerpt
from the following page:

http://www.xfs.org/index.php/Getting_the_latest_source_code

XFS user space tools

    * xfsprogs

$ git clone git://oss.sgi.com/xfs/cmds/xfsprogs

XFS dump

    * xfsdump

$ git clone git://oss.sgi.com/xfs/cmds/xfsdump

XFS tests

    * xfstests

$ git clone git://oss.sgi.com/xfs/cmds/xfstests

DMAPI user space tools

    * dmapi

$ git clone git://oss.sgi.com/xfs/cmds/dmapi


At times though the repos on kernel.org could be ahead of sgi ones.

Felix

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>