| To: | Mark Goodwin <goodwinos@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] xfstests: add "quick" group |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 15 Feb 2009 19:47:49 -0600 |
| Cc: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <4998B90B.1000605@xxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20090214164245.GD19813@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <49972260.4000702@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20090215182153.GA31179@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <49986233.6050600@xxxxxxxxxxx> <4998B90B.1000605@xxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Macintosh/20081209) |
Mark Goodwin wrote: > Eric Sandeen wrote: >> Christoph Hellwig wrote: >>>> Most are probably close enough, but 178 looks nasty - seems to be >>>> xfs_repair that's taking so long. These are running on 100G partitions, >>>> though :) >>> 178 only takes 16 seconds for me, running on 10G partitions. >> interesting that a 10x size growth makes a 22x time growth. >> > > It would be interesting to see if Barry's "memory optimization" > patches (that I posted) improve the linearity here. > > Cheers > -- Mark > I'll have to try it :) (of course it was on totally different hardware, too... but worth checking out) -Eric |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] xfstests: add "quick" group, Mark Goodwin |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 11/17] xfs: merge xfs_inode_flush into xfs_fs_write_inode, Dave Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] xfstests: add "quick" group, Mark Goodwin |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 11/17] xfs: merge xfs_inode_flush into xfs_fs_write_inode, Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |