| To: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] xfstests: add "quick" group |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 15 Feb 2009 13:21:53 -0500 |
| Cc: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <49972260.4000702@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20090214164245.GD19813@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <49972260.4000702@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 01:58:24PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote: > Good plan, couple comments: > > should quick only be a subset auto tests or are they orthogonal? Just a subset of auto, yes. > A few tests you've flagged as quick don't met the 20s criteria on my > box, just FWIW; may be filesystem-size specific: > > 013 57 We need this one for sure. > 028 23 > 031 21 > 049 36 > 075 36 > 076 56 > 078 20 > 091 26 > 112 38 > 113 55 > 178 363 > > Most are probably close enough, but 178 looks nasty - seems to be > xfs_repair that's taking so long. These are running on 100G partitions, > though :) 178 only takes 16 seconds for me, running on 10G partitions. I'm fine removing tests, and 178 would be the first candidate, maybe 076 and 113, too. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: rfc 1/2: specfile: use rpm macros where possible, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 10/13] xfs: add CRC checks to the AGFL, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] xfstests: add "quick" group, Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] xfstests: add "quick" group, Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |