| To: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 11/17] xfs: merge xfs_inode_flush into xfs_fs_write_inode |
| From: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 15 Feb 2009 17:42:25 +1100 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20090126073202.588218000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Mail-followup-to: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <20090126073136.384490000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090126073202.588218000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 02:31:47AM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Spliting the task for a VFS-induced inode flush into two functions doesn't > make any sense, so merge the two functions dealing with it. I just realised that we should really be calling xfs_inode_flush() from xfs_sync_inodes_ag() - it open codes xfs_inode_flush() and doesn't have any of the non-blocking flush code for async flushes... Thoughts? Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] xfstests: add "quick" group, Eric Sandeen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Kjære uio.no konto Bruker, Universitetet i Oslo Help Desk |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH] xfstests: add "quick" group, Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 11/17] xfs: merge xfs_inode_flush into xfs_fs_write_inode, Christoph Hellwig |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |