| To: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: sunit & swidth on RAID-1? |
| From: | Michael Monnerie <michael.monnerie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 11 Feb 2009 22:12:28 +0100 |
| In-reply-to: | <20090211165316.GA4430@dentifrice> |
| Organization: | it-management http://it-management.at |
| References: | <20090211155638.GA3864@dentifrice> <alpine.DEB.1.10.0902111141560.18885@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090211165316.GA4430@dentifrice> |
| User-agent: | KMail/1.10.3 (Linux/2.6.27.13-ZMI; KDE/4.1.3; x86_64; ; ) |
On Mittwoch 11 Februar 2009 mike dentifrice wrote: > sunit=0 swidth=0 blks, unwritten=1 > sectsz=512 sunit=0 blks > > What's the consequence of 0 values in this case? XFS then knows that 512 byte (aka sector) alignment is sufficient, as RAID-1 will only write 512b to each disk and does not need full stripe unit writes like RAID-4/5/6 need. Therefore performance is better with the values you have. mfg zmi -- // Michael Monnerie, Ing.BSc ----- http://it-management.at // Tel: 0660 / 415 65 31 .network.your.ideas. // PGP Key: "curl -s http://zmi.at/zmi.asc | gpg --import" // Fingerprint: AC19 F9D5 36ED CD8A EF38 500E CE14 91F7 1C12 09B4 // Keyserver: wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net Key-ID: 1C1209B4 |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: rfc 1/2: specfile: use rpm macros where possible, Eric Sandeen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XFS kernel BUG at fs/buffer.c:470! with 2.6.28.4, Alessandro Bono |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: sunit & swidth on RAID-1?, Justin Piszcz |
| Next by Thread: | Re: sunit & swidth on RAID-1?, Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |