| To: | mike dentifrice <fluor@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: sunit & swidth on RAID-1? |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 11 Feb 2009 10:46:26 -0600 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20090211155638.GA3864@dentifrice> |
| References: | <20090211155638.GA3864@dentifrice> |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Macintosh/20081209) |
mike dentifrice wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to know if it makes any sense to specify sunit & swidth
> parameters as mount options to XFS filesystems sitting on a Linux
> software RAID-1 array, as advertised here [1] or there [2].
>
> I'm asking, because it seems that chunk_size does not matter in a RAID-1
> context, nor do stripe units; or do they?
I don't think it does matter. And for what it's worth, mkfs.xfs queries
an MD raid, but ignores raid1/10/0:
/*
* Ignore levels we don't want aligned (e.g. linear)
* and deduct disk(s) from stripe width on RAID4/5/6
*/
switch (md.level) {
case 6:
md.raid_disks--;
/* fallthrough */
case 5:
case 4:
md.raid_disks--;
/* fallthrough */
case 1:
case 0:
case 10:
break;
default:
return 0;
In general, mkfs.xfs on md should just "do the right thing"
-Eric
> Any tip would be appreciated,
>
> [1] http://www.socalsysadmin.com/2008/10/15/optimizing-xfs-on-raid-arrays/
> [2] http://feedblog.org/2008/06/18/howto-configure-raid-strides-in-xfs/
>
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: sunit & swidth on RAID-1?, Justin Piszcz |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: rfc 1/2: specfile: use rpm macros where possible, Eric Sandeen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: sunit & swidth on RAID-1?, Michael Monnerie |
| Next by Thread: | rfc 1/2: specfile: use rpm macros where possible, Jan Engelhardt |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |