xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 1/2] xfs: fix error handling in xfs_log_mount

To: Felix Blyakher <felixb@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] xfs: fix error handling in xfs_log_mount
From: Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 10:24:37 +1100
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1E52072E-CA98-430B-9B2F-FDD0FDD1A7A4@xxxxxxx>
Organization: SGI
References: <20090210194422.767988000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090210194515.509547000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <A482AB92-6E29-43EA-A671-43D86E041335@xxxxxxx> <20090210195756.GA7569@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1E52072E-CA98-430B-9B2F-FDD0FDD1A7A4@xxxxxxx>
Reply-to: lachlan@xxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20081209)
Felix Blyakher wrote:

On Feb 10, 2009, at 1:57 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:

On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 01:56:31PM -0600, Felix Blyakher wrote:
Isn't it a reworked Lachlan's patch:

http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2009-02/msg00175.html

The patch isn't related to that one at all,

... from the implementation point of view, yes.

but it aims to fix the
same issue.

That's what I meant.

Should probably get a Reported-by: tag for him,

Seems reasonable.

if
this is indeed the thing the original patch tried to fix.

That was my understanding. Let's Lachlan pitch in.
I'd prefer both fixes go in so we have maximum defence against
this problem happening again but I'm really not fussed.


Felix

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>