xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFS kernel BUG at fs/buffer.c:470! with 2.6.28.4

To: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: XFS kernel BUG at fs/buffer.c:470! with 2.6.28.4
From: Alessandro Bono <alessandro.bono@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:53:14 +0100
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:from:to:cc :in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version :x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; bh=P2L4VYwze+jX/U8FWc/c4ON5wDEGBoA7qD/UmCqeOnw=; b=a+POmlksps/dT6bc7O6HSRjLQ9/G2EeGKOGoPUFl/THYYzIMdX/hMmlyx26onKRns2 RtFviJEMBt4ZHHq5JaVOQhJEugk5jQcNpKK6Yq0nOXXGVdffD2BIaRDk0HNazuSdyfuP /p5Vzu6FNTS4WRKxDz3KPFp+7LKzz1wCO1+9I=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date :message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; b=Bo7/Z8oVDPSkN1isN3dQam6pNcocg6f1pLjuTlcFhvrtPEq5UQ1XJIGv2qZKNjHveI 8LkKytwmEt28QF8Qg92440pDNW51VF3FYa4vZuAbCjKyHcp3W1t1ZFXnygaoaBs9M9yn o5aTDenuU+U5O9yUT6114M7sR6MjZSM5dwdhE=
In-reply-to: <20090210104304.GP8830@disturbed>
References: <1234011974.7435.11.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090208222859.GA2532@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1234132752.12370.0.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090208224249.GA11931@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1234133120.12370.7.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090209075308.GA7360@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090210104304.GP8830@disturbed>
On Tue, 2009-02-10 at 21:43 +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 02:53:08AM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 08, 2009 at 11:45:20PM +0100, Alessandro Bono wrote:
> > > sure, attached
> > 
> > That would be a missing PagePrivate bit in page_buffers() called from
> > end_buffer_async_write.  PG_private can only be cleared via drop_buffers
> > which requires the page not having PG_writeback set which must be
> > set until end_buffer_async_write is done.  Very strange, and all this
> > is generic code without xfs involvement.  Did this happen once
> > or can you reproduce it?
> 
> Hmmmm - i wonder if this has anything to do with the writeback fixes
> that went into 2.6.28.2? Alessandro, can you revert to 2.6.28.1 (not
> plain 2.6.28) and see if you can reproduce the problem?

no problem 
I'll try with 2.6.28.1 a full rsync (circa 210G)
maybe I can do this today


> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Dave.
-- 
---
Cordiali Saluti
Alessandro Bono

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>