xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFS kernel BUG at fs/buffer.c:470! with 2.6.28.4

To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: XFS kernel BUG at fs/buffer.c:470! with 2.6.28.4
From: Alessandro Bono <alessandro.bono@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 23:45:20 +0100
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:from:to:cc :in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version :x-mailer; bh=ISrqa8FkPF9Pw2SJFFaEB4ExAW3vATJ2HoFoEWpBbyA=; b=itPrGu2rc75JQPC9gC9o+1Vm1mhULz6WCQ6anImwn3wfbvuvyfB3JMB9uFqJQydMOh i0WXzCmU4HqSmW5mPywY6Y4x9MEvK016k6qlM42iLdB4cM3hNuLlYLSpG1siB6nfRrn3 NHQK9z7yvvWsG7RZcpzjmZveI5Hj+gfJB6dhA=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date :message-id:mime-version:x-mailer; b=cROjgtYyUNpMs4mMyAmsBJpqJijFtM33gxLv8JSGeqlBZqEljD5Pu9rQqPBg+kuZXk WXLz0yaTRG4yx/7j5SBUUrK3zxMzuWOIufx9/lzMQNre9jL3UcqhONCsfV8o+xFJqW6r JRcOkiehy1RFuiAqLcwgBkLHVs6xJMlR+9aT4=
In-reply-to: <20090208224249.GA11931@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1234011974.7435.11.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090208222859.GA2532@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1234132752.12370.0.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090208224249.GA11931@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Sun, 2009-02-08 at 17:42 -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 08, 2009 at 11:39:12PM +0100, Alessandro Bono wrote:
> > On Sun, 2009-02-08 at 17:28 -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > On Sat, Feb 07, 2009 at 02:06:13PM +0100, Alessandro Bono wrote:
> > > > Feb  7 12:43:12 champagne kernel: [ 5828.167041] ------------[ cut
> > > > here ]------------
> > > > Feb  7 12:43:12 champagne kernel: [ 5828.167048] kernel BUG at
> > > > fs/buffer.c:470!
> > > 
> > > Per
> > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/hpa/linux-2.6-allstable.git;a=blob;f=fs/buffer.c;h=665d446b25bc034241ef54c3c6b1d239c0ccf0f9;hb=d5b562330ec766292a3ac54ae5e0673610bd5b3d
> > > 
> > > line 470 in fs/buffer.c of 2.6.28.4 has a comment and no actual code.
> > > 
> > > What additional patches do you have applied?
> > > 
> > 
> > vanilla kernel
> > no additional patches at all
> 
> Well, the 2.6.28.4 clearly doesn't have a bug there.  Can you
> attach the fs/buffer.c you built the kernel from?
> 

sure, attached

-- 
---
Cordiali Saluti
Alessandro Bono

Attachment: buffer.c
Description: Text Data

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>