| To: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 09/17] xfs: cleanup xfs_find_handle |
| From: | Felix Blyakher <felixb@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 6 Feb 2009 14:31:14 -0600 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20090206071717.GA3295@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20090126073136.384490000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090126073202.277472000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <F4717E19-7A7F-40CD-BAEB-7AE519E797D0@xxxxxxx> <20090206071717.GA3295@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
On Feb 6, 2009, at 1:17 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 11:20:22PM -0600, Felix Blyakher wrote:Do we want to verify here that cmd is either XFS_IOC_PATH_TO_FSHANDLE or XFS_IOC_PATH_TO_HANDLE ...It's called in a single place for just these three subcases, so having another verification here doesn't seem juseful. Yes, I know it's called from xfs_file_ioctl() only, and only with the those three commands, but I prefer the defensive code, which would flag something unexpected rather then going the wrong way. Though, in this case, I'm not too much set on the "defensive" side :) Reviewed-by: Felix Blyakher <felixb@xxxxxxx> |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Inode Core Information, Nathan Scott |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Does XFS support the sync mount option?, Dave Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 09/17] xfs: cleanup xfs_find_handle, Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | Inode Core Information, cyjoyp |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |