| To: | Michael Monnerie <michael.monnerie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: xfs open questions |
| From: | Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 28 Jan 2009 09:09:04 -0600 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <4980712A.4050500@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <200901270928.29215@xxxxxx> <200901280003.30518@xxxxxx> <497FDC16.6050809@xxxxxxxxxxx> <200901280952.26027@xxxxxx> <4980712A.4050500@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Macintosh/20070728) |
Russell Cattelan wrote: > Michael Monnerie wrote: > >> On Mittwoch 28 Januar 2009 Russell Cattelan wrote: >> >> >>> The sig is there, are you saying it's broken somehow? >>> It might have something to do with the html stripper. >>> >>> >> Yes, I use kmail (from KDE) which automatically displays mails with gpg- >> sigs in different colours to easily see if it's correct/trusted/wrong. >> And on this list, my messages all come with "Invalid Sig". >> >> > > Well I ran a test email through the test list on oss and it seems to > work fine. > > Let try it here then, I'm going to sign this and see if it come back to > me with a valid sig. > > > Grr try #2
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: xfs open questions, Eric Sandeen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: xfs open questions, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: xfs open questions, Russell Cattelan |
| Next by Thread: | invalidated gpg signatures (was: Re: xfs open questions), Martin Steigerwald |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |