xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: xfs open questions

To: Michael Monnerie <michael.monnerie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: xfs open questions
From: Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 08:52:26 -0600
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <200901280952.26027@xxxxxx>
References: <200901270928.29215@xxxxxx> <200901280003.30518@xxxxxx> <497FDC16.6050809@xxxxxxxxxxx> <200901280952.26027@xxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Macintosh/20070728)
Michael Monnerie wrote:
> On Mittwoch 28 Januar 2009 Russell Cattelan wrote:
>   
>> The sig is there, are you saying it's broken somehow?
>> It might have something to do with the html stripper.
>>     
>
> Yes, I use kmail (from KDE) which automatically displays mails with gpg-
> sigs in different colours to easily see if it's correct/trusted/wrong. 
> And on this list, my messages all come with "Invalid Sig".
>   

Well I ran a test email through the test list on oss and it seems to
work fine.

Let try it here then, I'm going to sign this and see if it come back to
me with
a valid sig.

> mfg zmi
>   
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
>   

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>