xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] xfsprogs: update doc/CHANGES

To: Nathan Scott <nscott@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfsprogs: update doc/CHANGES
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 00:28:59 -0500
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1232774578.13684.5.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20090123005648.GA3194@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1232774578.13684.5.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 04:22:58PM +1100, Nathan Scott wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-01-22 at 19:56 -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
> 
> > +   - Various xfs_quta fixes, thanks to Arkadiusz Miskiewicz
> 
> typo.
> 
> > +   - Addition of the xfs_fsr and xfs_estimate tools previous found
> > +     in the xfsdump package
> 
> rpm magic is probably needed in build/rpm/rpm.spec.in to prevent
> old versions of xfsdump from being installed alongside the new
> xfsprogs ... else rpm will report file conflicts, I think?  Same
> will be needed in debian/control... hmm, both should be pretty
> easy - just change "Conflicts: xfsdump < 2.0.0" to "3.0.0" (and
> we should make xfsdump v3 at this time too, so its very clear).

Agreed.  I think it's better to leave the debian part to you, and
I'll look into the rpm part later.

Any chance you could also review the fsr and estimate manpage
patches as they should go in before this one?

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>