[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [XFS] 2.6.29-rc2: XFS internal error XFS_WANT_CORRUPTED_GOTO

To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [XFS] 2.6.29-rc2: XFS internal error XFS_WANT_CORRUPTED_GOTO
From: Jacek Luczak <difrost.kernel@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 12:47:16 +0100
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>, LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs mailing list <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=VNQtA5PlipskdRWxIXlErRTmUSm9f6qlu4vWuxDUvOQ=; b=a/aD/RkI8NpNpNrasoUXI5rT/6TbkI1ATxhiojV+9seR6e0lyBtcN5CozQM2rErsX0 sROvXBNVGfsI5i/1bmCf0mtxQJcKtfwrXtT5eLGpYBAfXh6RnRZhrz4LAni+t+93/ipH yVKnE4CKmOj0DBO8eGCwV6rwKjkmh1JHM/yrE=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Dkmk4bTMwsBFUq9k0678cfCPZNLzKSwFZzGG+73BNXAF4bLJ9iM8wm5lbXS8JtAnO7 APTpAG+W3/4G9ZdT4HvwVbfUAQE5aZOoU3JiMQIs5vlpdIjhjbJxUMfjo6R6N/2ryY3+ K8nX5k38UbpBHL2t7jtGCODXzJIDSEOpBDBgY=
In-reply-to: <20090120112910.GA6831@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <497468C1.3000001@xxxxxxxxx> <4974CA20.6050308@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20090120004611.GA6445@disturbed> <20090120112910.GA6831@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird (X11/20081209)
Christoph Hellwig pisze:
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 11:46:11AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 12:44:48PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>>> Jacek Luczak wrote:
>>>> Hi All,
>>>> I've stepped into XFS issue/bug. Yesterday I've compiled 2.6.29-rc2 and no
>>>> didn't found errors. Today I've booted my notebook and XFS bug have 
>>>> occurred.
>>>> System reboot didn't helped, same error appeared.
>>>> Some info:
>>>> [1] config: http://pin.if.uz.zgora.pl/~difrost/linux-next/2.6.29-rc2.config
>>>> [2] kernel logs:
>>>> http://pin.if.uz.zgora.pl/~difrost/linux-next/2.6.29-rc2_XFS-bug.log
>>>> [3] most interesting part of log below.
>>> so this happens every mount?  Reproducible is good.  How large is the
>>> filesystem (too large to extract elsewhere for analysis...?) (plus I
>>> suppose it'll be hard to get to it when you can't even boot....)
>> XFS folks, I suspect the common link between all the reports of this
>> bug is that they are on 32-bit kernels. I can't reproduce this on
>> a 64 bit kernel, and I'm trying to get a 32-bit UML built right now
>> to test this theory.
> I'm doing about half of my testing on 32 bit x86, and I couldn't
> reproduce the detailed receipe  in the kernel.org bugzilla yet.
> Just curious:  do you have CONFIG_LBD set?
Hi Christoph,

the answer is:
$ grep LBD .config
# CONFIG_LBD is not set


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>