xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [XFS] 2.6.29-rc2: XFS internal error XFS_WANT_CORRUPTED_GOTO

To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Jacek Luczak <difrost.kernel@xxxxxxxxx>, LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs mailing list <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [XFS] 2.6.29-rc2: XFS internal error XFS_WANT_CORRUPTED_GOTO
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 06:29:10 -0500
In-reply-to: <20090120004611.GA6445@disturbed>
References: <497468C1.3000001@xxxxxxxxx> <4974CA20.6050308@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20090120004611.GA6445@disturbed>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 11:46:11AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 12:44:48PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> > Jacek Luczak wrote:
> > > Hi All,
> > > 
> > > I've stepped into XFS issue/bug. Yesterday I've compiled 2.6.29-rc2 and no
> > > didn't found errors. Today I've booted my notebook and XFS bug have 
> > > occurred.
> > > System reboot didn't helped, same error appeared.
> > > 
> > > Some info:
> > > [1] config: 
> > > http://pin.if.uz.zgora.pl/~difrost/linux-next/2.6.29-rc2.config
> > > [2] kernel logs:
> > > http://pin.if.uz.zgora.pl/~difrost/linux-next/2.6.29-rc2_XFS-bug.log
> > > [3] most interesting part of log below.
> > 
> > so this happens every mount?  Reproducible is good.  How large is the
> > filesystem (too large to extract elsewhere for analysis...?) (plus I
> > suppose it'll be hard to get to it when you can't even boot....)
> 
> XFS folks, I suspect the common link between all the reports of this
> bug is that they are on 32-bit kernels. I can't reproduce this on
> a 64 bit kernel, and I'm trying to get a 32-bit UML built right now
> to test this theory.

I'm doing about half of my testing on 32 bit x86, and I couldn't
reproduce the detailed receipe  in the kernel.org bugzilla yet.

Just curious:  do you have CONFIG_LBD set?

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>