xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [linux-dvb] compiling on 2.6.28 broken?

To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [linux-dvb] compiling on 2.6.28 broken?
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 17:06:57 -0500
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, chris.mason@xxxxxxxxxx, handygewinnspiel@xxxxxx, matthew@xxxxxx, rjw@xxxxxxx, HWerner4@xxxxxx, viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, mchehab@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, stable@xxxxxxxxxx, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>, Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@xxxxxxx>, xfs mailing list <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <496E5DB8.1030007@xxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20090113105947.9e774b69.akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090113191757.74290@xxxxxxx> <20090113113700.776a94b5.akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090113203843.GJ29283@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1231957750.8269.28.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <496E56EB.2030301@xxxxxx> <1231968240.8269.48.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <496E5AB2.7040507@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20090114134417.e6b29b52.akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <496E5DB8.1030007@xxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 03:48:40PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> > This patch applies OK to 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.  Is it also needed there? 
> > If so, it should have had "Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxx>" in the changelog so
> > that it doesn't get lost.
> > 
> 
> It is needed for .28, but should not be needed for .27 AFAIK.

That's correct.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>