| To: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: help with xfs_repair on 10TB fs |
| From: | Alberto Accomazzi <aaccomazzi@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 17 Jan 2009 18:14:21 -0500 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=iRQOJ4m0tGK8GTGHxCtCIw+2PEVUhEmenKqWIMrczsc=; b=Hbt8FN43eA3DgYe5eN0IeY+Vsh6oiUpjIlgYpE2qXSA56dqKbPjHDW53EY562aGl7y x8fvq/HtC2XRT87WDG7kbLJf4e5gDntN6ZPLd1zPyVP0WP8hfHpVaAD/PRo7pPVj2ttH CcAc5sXtbSZMT+BYtw2mg1foDfDEaHlojxdbg= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=mA3rtm2kGdBf6HR8SpiVI/1qTYbn/9THdgOlWVY0IxLfixk67vnmyASXqv0chw/fwj u+lg51F0LzBpqizHVMsDP2efNWSqUr+yB2W93kXy+JisH50skzaNn7vwT7EM9OfglAwe ZpT9izB5Sp09j8J86k83rBchO6Njc6+07m75E= |
| In-reply-to: | <49722875.90202@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <adcf4ef70901170913l693376d7s6fd0395e2c88e10@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4972166D.5000006@xxxxxxxxxxx> <adcf4ef70901171042p31054ae0rb56819fce7b6f47e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <49722875.90202@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Alberto Accomazzi wrote: >> On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> Alberto Accomazzi wrote: >>>> I need some help with figuring out how to repair a large XFS >>>> filesystem (10TB of data, 100+ million files). xfs_repair seems to >>>> have crapped out before finishing the job and now I'm not sure how to >>>> proceed. >>> How did it "crap out? >> >> >> Well, in the way I described below, namely it ran for several hours and then >> died without completing. As you can see from the log (which captured both >> stdout and stderr) there's nothing that indicates what terminated the >> program. And it's definitely not running now. >> >> >>> the src.rpm from >>> >>> http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/xfsprogs/2.10.2/3.fc11/src/ >>> >> >> Ok, I guess it's worth giving it a shot. I assume I don't need to worry >> about kernel modules because the xfsprogs don't depend on that, right? For the record, after upgrading to xfsprogs-2.10.2 as suggested by Eric, xfs_repair completed successfully. Unfortunately now I'm left with dealing with quite a mess: 388K files in lost+found, with a filesystem of over 160M inodes. ugh... Thanks for all your help, though... -- Alberto |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: kernel 2.6.28 XFS internal error xfs_da_do_buf(2) at line 2112 of file fs/xfs/xfs_da_btree.c, Alessandro Bono |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: problems showing up as XFS problems on kernels after 2.6.28-git2, Danny ter Haar |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: help with xfs_repair on 10TB fs, Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: help with xfs_repair on 10TB fs, Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |