| To: | Tru Huynh <tru@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: help with xfs_repair on 10TB fs |
| From: | Alberto Accomazzi <aaccomazzi@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 17 Jan 2009 13:45:15 -0500 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=KGScyPBEMwVChv5naqZZhg0jaFlobvzsak3l2aQN1FE=; b=MqqshYl4ey9tTS2yPlmuBRZOoMWV1huHtsE9jUkJ2zLO9jjLa0UJqZB3iH2Ip0fLFm VhMRwW4xEKsq6VJvMyLEYrFXZECbC5Fbc3z7ZrNwjYU96bM9srzpakd3dWcm93xu07ZB 8ECtTWrPUQ1hMKArFmwgbxWqvDkMb59CgUEcE= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=FaA3ecGwiabK1ivfWz6H30r1e2kzvkiyb8HWyjGgdgmRBGM8pQDz0S87Tu0Yap1l7o 36urgtY6i4Zl50nW+LsJIgEX2tDRToQYl0KZw7xZUK25u8jR7u1UYk1vz4UJY+hupd/c 2KL2lzemVFtxvWQdzaKbUpkxvGEx3Ops1lLQ8= |
| In-reply-to: | <20090117173537.GH15444@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <adcf4ef70901170913l693376d7s6fd0395e2c88e10@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090117173537.GH15444@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 12:35 PM, Tru Huynh <tru@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 12:13:26PM -0500, Alberto Accomazzi wrote: > > I need some help with figuring out how to repair a large XFS > > filesystem (10TB of data, 100+ million files). xfs_repair seems to > > have crapped out before finishing the job and now I'm not sure how to > > proceed. > > > > The system is a CentOS 5.2 storage server with a 3ware controller and > > 16 x 1TB drives, 32GB RAM and 64GB swap. After clearing the issues > > with bad blocks on the disks, yesterday we set out to fix the > > filesystem. This is the list of relevant packages that yum reports > > installed: > > > > kmod-xfs.x86_64 0.4-1.2.6.18_53.1.14.e installed > > kmod-xfs.x86_64 0.4-2 installed > > kmod-xfs.x86_64 0.4-1.2.6.18_92.1.10.e installed > > xfsdump.x86_64 2.2.46-1.el5.centos installed > > xfsprogs.x86_64 2.9.4-1.el5.centos installed > > xfsprogs-devel.x86_64 2.9.4-1.el5.centos installed > > kernel.x86_64 2.6.18-92.1.13.el5.cen installed > > > are you using the centosplus kernel? or just the regular kernel + kmod-xfs? > > if xfsprogs ran out of memory, try the testing version available at > http://people.centos.org/tru/XFS/centos-5/RPMS/x86_64/ > Right now we're running centosplus: Linux adsduo 2.6.18-92.1.13.el5.centos.plus #1 SMP Wed Oct 1 13:41:35 EDT 2008 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux What is the current thinking about this vs. regular kernel + kmod-xfs? -- AA [[HTML alternate version deleted]] |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: help with xfs_repair on 10TB fs, Alberto Accomazzi |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: help with xfs_repair on 10TB fs, Eric Sandeen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: help with xfs_repair on 10TB fs, Tru Huynh |
| Next by Thread: | kernel 2.6.28 XFS internal error xfs_da_do_buf(2) at line 2112 of file fs/xfs/xfs_da_btree.c, Alessandro Bono |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |