| To: | Bill Kendall <wkendall@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] xfsdump support for 64K page size |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 9 Jan 2009 14:41:15 -0500 |
| Cc: | Mark Goodwin <markgw@xxxxxxx>, xfs-dev <xfs-dev@xxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <4967A73E.9020907@xxxxxxx> |
| References: | <4964C5EF.3060308@xxxxxxx> <4965629C.2000703@xxxxxxx> <20090108222800.GG9448@disturbed> <4967A73E.9020907@xxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 01:36:30PM -0600, Bill Kendall wrote: > Once that is done, I suggest we put Dave's original patches in the > -dev trees. That way it'll have proper attribution as well as commit > messages with some detail. The commits were merged back to the -dev trees alredy, and at least for xfsprogs we already have a commit ontop. I'd say let's use how this was handled as a bad example and get over it. What we should do however is putting dump images of every page size we can hold of (4k/8k/16k/64k) and maybe both endianesses into the xfstests repository so we can exercise them as part of the normal QA procedure. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] xfsdump support for 64K page size, Bill Kendall |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: problems showing up as XFS problems on kernels after 2.6.28-git2, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] xfsdump support for 64K page size, Bill Kendall |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] xfsdump support for 64K page size, Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |