| To: | Tritium Tritium <tritium_helium@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: retrocompatibility XFS 2.10.1 with 2.8.1 ? |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 6 Jan 2009 09:00:33 -0600 |
| Cc: | "<david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>" <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <BAY123-W41D72B924FD31C7FE4A93DEADE0@xxxxxxx> |
| References: | <BAY123-W145701C4842C1B063295BDEAE10@xxxxxxx> <20090106011014.GA9448@disturbed> <BAY123-W41D72B924FD31C7FE4A93DEADE0@xxxxxxx> |
On Jan 6, 2009, at 2:03 AM, Tritium Tritium <tritium_helium@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: Thanks for you response ! unfortunately , I don't know the kernel version of my Adsl Box .I search in documentation and I don't find any item about a parameter which take a compatibility with old xfs support . Log in and type uname -a -Eric Thanks and I hope see you later ! Vince.Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 12:10:14 +1100 From: david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx To: tritium_helium@xxxxxxxxxxx CC: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: retrocompatibility XFS 2.10.1 with 2.8.1 ? On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 07:04:30PM +0000, Tritium Tritium wrote:HI ! In first, I 'm a french user and sorry for my very bad english ...For an Adsl Box, I want to partitionning and format my external hard disk drive under XFS .What a good idea , isn't it ? ;o) I get my Mandriva One (I know it isn't a "professionnal" distribution but you know the French search the simple thing !) and use fdisk -l , gparted and mkfs.xfs /dev/xxx . With this, the adsl box reboot ! And of course it doesn't recognize the partition.I tried with a Debian Etch XFS ... and this is a SUCCESS !When I compare XFS versions I find a 2.10.1 for Mandriva and 2.8.1 for Debian.The defaults mkfs.xfs uses in 2.10.1 are different to 2.8.1. The newer version enables features that are only availble in more recent kernels (since about 2.6.19, IIRC), so it would seem that your ADSL box has an old kernel on it that does not support the newer, faster, shinier features XFS has.... The kernel version of your ADSL box, as well as the mkfs.xfs output from both distro's would help confirm this. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx_________________________________________________________________Téléphonez gratuitement à tous vos proches avec Windows Live Messenger ! Téléchargez-le maintenant !http://www.windowslive.fr/messenger/1.asp [[HTML alternate version deleted]] _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: need help to repair XFS partition, Chris Wedgwood |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: need help to repair XFS partition, Eric Sandeen |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: retrocompatibility XFS 2.10.1 with 2.8.1 ?, Tritium Tritium |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH] define xfs_ino_t as unsigned long long, Christoph Hellwig |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |