| To: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] define xfs_ino_t as unsigned long long |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 6 Jan 2009 03:22:14 -0500 |
| In-reply-to: | <20090106011414.GB9448@disturbed> |
| References: | <20090105193129.GA19909@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090106011414.GB9448@disturbed> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 12:14:14PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 02:31:29PM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > That way we can avoid ugly casts when printining it (like the ones > > that show up on powerpc with Linus' current tree). > > Is that because ppc uses int-l64.h instead of int-64ll.h and so __64 gets > defined to an unsigned long on that platform? Yes. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: retrocompatibility XFS 2.10.1 with 2.8.1 ?, Tritium Tritium |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [patch] mm: fix lockless pagecache reordering bug (was Re: BUG: soft lockup - is this XFS problem?), Peter Klotz |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] define xfs_ino_t as unsigned long long, Dave Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH] xfs_repair: allow filesystems with a single allocation group, Christoph Hellwig |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |