| To: | Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: spurious -ENOSPC on XFS |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 18 Jan 2009 12:31:44 -0500 |
| Cc: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.64.0901132324070.16396@hs20-bc2-1.build.redhat.com> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.64.0901120509550.11089@hs20-bc2-1.build.redhat.com> <20090113214949.GN8071@disturbed> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0901132324070.16396@hs20-bc2-1.build.redhat.com> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 11:28:58PM -0500, Mikulas Patocka wrote: > The result must not depend on magic timer values. If it does, you end up > with undebbugable nondeterministic failures. > > Why don't you change that 500ms wait to "wait until the flush finishes"? > That would be correct. Yes, this probably would better. Could I motivate you to come up with a patch for that? |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 0/7] Remaining 2.6.29 queue, Felix Blyakher |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] xfs_repair: allow filesystems with a single allocation group, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: spurious -ENOSPC on XFS, Mikulas Patocka |
| Next by Thread: | Re: spurious -ENOSPC on XFS, Mikulas Patocka |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |