| To: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [XFS updates] XFS development tree branch, for-linus, updated. v2.6.28-rc3-9167-g0335cb7 |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 09 Jan 2009 11:40:53 -0600 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, akpm@xxxxxxxx, torvalds@xxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20090109065935.GA1600@infradead.org> |
| References: | <200901090619.n096Jp20017008@oss.sgi.com> <20090109065935.GA1600@infradead.org> |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090105) |
Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 12:19:51AM -0600, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: >> commit 0335cb76aa3fa913a2164bc9b669e5aef9d56fa3 >> Author: Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Date: Wed Dec 31 12:10:12 2008 +1100 >> >> [XFS] Update maintainers >> >> New maintainer contact and new tree location. >> >> Reviewed-by: Bill O`Donnell <billodo@xxxxxxx> >> Signed-off-by: Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@xxxxxxx> > > Folks, it's pretty strange to change the maintainer of a project to > a person who hasn't done a single commit yet, and without discussion > with the community who has done almost all of the maintainer work > for a long time. I think this should get a little more public > discussion. Perhaps if sgi could start by explaining the reasons for the change, it would be useful for this discussion. -Eric |
| Previous by Date: | Re: XFS: xfs_trans_cancel Filesystem shutdown, Russell Cattelan |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] xfsdump support for 64K page size, Bill Kendall |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [XFS updates] XFS development tree branch, for-linus, updated. v2.6.28-rc3-9167-g0335cb7, Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [XFS updates] XFS development tree branch, for-linus, updated. v2.6.28-rc3-9167-g0335cb7, Bill O'Donnell |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |