Re: [PATCH] xfsdump support for 64K page size

[Mark Goodwin <markgw@xxxxxxx>]

Bill Kendall wrote:
> Various fixes to allow xfsdump/xfsrestore to work with 64K
> page size. This is essentially Chinner's patch from a while
> back.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bill Kendall <wkendall@xxxxxxx>

Lachlan reviewed and ack'd this on an internal list and I've committed
it (on Bill's behalf) as follows :

git://oss.sgi.com/xfs/cmds/xfsdump.git
        commit 9502587dbbfdd465958889a568dc2842f10b1ff9
        Author: Mark Goodwin <markgw@xxxxxxx>
        Date:   Thu Jan 8 12:37:53 2009 +1100

            Various fixes to allow xfsdump/xfsrestore to work with 64K
            page size. This is essentially Chinner's patch from a while
            back.
        
            Signed-off-by: Bill Kendall <wkendall@xxxxxxx>
            Signed-off-by: Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@xxxxxxx>
            Signed-off-by: Mark Goodwin <markgw@xxxxxxx>

and for the libhandle changes :

git://oss.sgi.com/xfs/cmds/xfsprogs.git
        commit aa23a327ad7bb659f94c492119c928038d13b069
        Author: Mark Goodwin <markgw@xxxxxxx>
        Date:   Thu Jan 8 12:37:11 2009 +1100

            Various fixes to allow xfsdump/xfsrestore to work with 64K
            page size. This is essentially Chinner's patch from a while
            back.
        
            Signed-off-by: Bill Kendall <wkendall@xxxxxxx>
            Signed-off-by: Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@xxxxxxx>
            Signed-off-by: Mark Goodwin <markgw@xxxxxxx>

This introduces a dependency between xfsdump and libhandle (in xfsprogs),
which may or may not be an issue now that the cmds are in split trees.
I guess maybe xfsdump/restore should rightfully be part of xfsprogs?

In any case, Christoph, please pull these commits into your kernel.org 
-dev trees.

Thanks
-- Mark