| To: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 0/3] freeze feature ver 1.14 |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 2 Jan 2009 04:47:30 -0500 |
| Cc: | Takashi Sato <t-sato@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx" <dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx>, "viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "mtk.manpages@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <mtk.manpages@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "axboe@xxxxxxxxx" <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>, "linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <495DA488.7080702@sandeen.net> |
| References: | <20081027215811t-sato@mail.jp.nec.com> <495DA488.7080702@sandeen.net> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Thu, Jan 01, 2009 at 11:22:16PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote: > In lieu of the timeout feature which was originally proposed, how > about access to an emergency un-freeze via magic sysrq, maybe > piggy-backed on emergency sync... something like this (not > tested or even built yet...), would this be a good compromise to > help save people from frozen roots? Looks sane to me. But for that we'd need to get the generic freeze bits in first. Andrews, as they are in 2.6.28-rc2 do you plan to send them? Any chance for a general -mm merge plan, btw? |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 0/3] freeze feature ver 1.14, Eric Sandeen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [GIT PULL] XFS update for 2.6.29, Geert Uytterhoeven |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 0/3] freeze feature ver 1.14, Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH] fix xfs_fsr insufficient space check, Chris Wedgwood |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |