[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 00/20] xfs-cmds staging tree

To: Mark Goodwin <markgw@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/20] xfs-cmds staging tree
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 15:49:57 -0500
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <494FF9B3.9030103@xxxxxxx>
References: <20081222163831.755809000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <494FF9B3.9030103@xxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 07:33:55AM +1100, Mark Goodwin wrote:
> Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> This is the staging tree of xfs patches.  Given that Barry is gone now it 
>> seem
>> like no one cares about userspace and I'll play patch monkey for now.
> Thanks Christoph. Lachlan and I were just discussing yesterday that
> it's time to set up a git repository for xfs-cmds on oss. This would
> contain all the userspace stuff: attr, acl, xfsprogs, dmapi, xfsdump
> and xfstests.
> Anyone have a reason not to keep all of this together in the one tree?
> I guess we'd need branches for 'master' (aka dev) and 'stable' or  
> something ..?

Yes, that's a plan.  Can you set it up in a way that we can push
directly to, similar to how Nathan does it for pcp?  Nathan would also
like to push to the xfs-cmds tree for the debian packaging, btw.

One thing we were discussing is if it's really a good idea to have all
these together.  acl and attr aren't really related to XFS, and it might
be a good idea to just have them maintained directly by Andreas.
xfsprogs is I think mostly by terrain these days with Barry gone,
xfstests is something I'd voluntter Eric for as he's been doing good
work on it.  xfsdump still has a maintainer with Bill Kendall, and dmapi
would probably be best left to the DMF group at SGI.  xfsmisc might be
better off as a scripts/ directory inside xfsprogs.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>