xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: xfs_repair problem.

To: "Eric Sandeen" <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: xfs_repair problem.
From: "David Bernick" <dbernick@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 12:07:28 -0500
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=Lz1Gu63MnorWa8F2t5RwOHJp2FutPp4jdqn3pjAuxdY=; b=oMJiGzbiyr0V5bZYf0j/9T0vn0YJB2c97+j0gTwO7bOgR7Szi9Xe+3zVQcLXRAc7e9 smuk+qSYS0wJxog0cwyyzEvd/fuEWjgXOXQj9NcAwLkws9RYfWW2Rve3m+z36zjjf+nu 3jzlRlAplLUEiYK4IrNOyN78++c1z3Ro3V+64=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=L91SpTDTW2VGYmpUCRvIFw+c6I98Qvl4g7UeEy1JUVXNSku43UD/GM5kTKLkg2rwDh VoJ4b+Z5s7UG+kcR9epKuCa0bTfqn2JFuNJapNvylYyDS7MESJvWjJZCWPmlmkggd0JJ bls7GSYUpSpx62hvckwbgrOkBM5mH+0UVJZPY=
In-reply-to: <494E766B.5080102@xxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <7bcfcfff0812210703r4bd889cave8e2d60c56587e3e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <494E66D9.5030704@xxxxxxxxxxx> <7bcfcfff0812210852v6c1cd522i334de914e1e9a112@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <494E766B.5080102@xxxxxxxxxxx>
The xfs_repair is running. seems to have stabilized at about 91% RAM usage.
It's at a part where its "clearing inode number in entry at offset...", so
hopefully its just progressing.

I'll grab the newest version of xfs_repair and try that if this all fails.
WHere can I grab the latest?

>
> > Kernel is - 2.6.18-92.1.1.el5
>
> heh; RHEL5 does not support xfs ;)
>
shhh. i know that :)

"well, you don't want to take out part of the device if the fs thinks it
owns it now, but from the db output I think you still have the smaller
size."

That's what I thought from looking at everything, too.

"I'd read through:

http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2008-01/msg00085.html";
I've been pouring through that thread since 3am EST :)


[[HTML alternate version deleted]]

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>