| To: | Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Intel X25-E running Linux using XFS |
| From: | Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 12 Dec 2008 19:58:03 +0100 |
| Cc: | smartmontools-support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, smartmontools-database-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ide@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, Alan Piszcz <ap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <alpine.DEB.1.10.0811271257470.2233@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <alpine.DEB.1.10.0811271257470.2233@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
Hi! > Due to the 100k write cycle lifetime, I will not be performing any more > benchmarks on the SSD itself, such benchmarks are available on > techreport.com but just wanted to send out the smart data for the > smartmontools list and point out it is working with linux+ich7+xfs. > > Overall, whenever I do anything now its just like the entire machine is > sitting in a ramdisk (similar when you boot knoppix and load to ramdisk). > > The techreport benchmarks are here: > http://techreport.com/articles.x/15931 Actually I'd like to know... how does it behave during powerfails while it is being written to? Flashes I seen (USB / SD) developed bad sectors in that case, and ext2/ext3 can't handle that. (And I don't think xfs can handle that either). Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | EasyDate now sharing their money making platform!, WL EasyDate Network |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Intel X25-E running Linux using XFS, Justin Piszcz |
| Previous by Thread: | EasyDate now sharing their money making platform!, WL EasyDate Network |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Intel X25-E running Linux using XFS, Justin Piszcz |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |