| To: | Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: New XFS git tree on oss.sgi.com |
| From: | Mark Goodwin <markgw@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 10 Dec 2008 11:46:51 +1100 |
| Cc: | Niv Sardi <xaiki@xxxxxxx>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <493F0831.8030405@xxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | SGI Engineering |
| References: | <492BA7AD.5080007@xxxxxxx> <20081125081644.GA20644@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <492C0B3D.3040002@xxxxxxxxxxx> <492CA07F.1030803@xxxxxxx> <492CC201.3080304@xxxxxxx> <ncc3ah6lyiw.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20081209091725.GA26180@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <493E9AB4.1050505@xxxxxxx> <nccvdtthtyi.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <493F0831.8030405@xxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | markgw@xxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (Windows/20081105) |
Russell Cattelan wrote: Niv Sardi wrote:You don't want to be pulling xfs-dev into a xfs/master tree, you should setup a remote properly and have local branch tracking them.Ya and this is a non trivial thing to do without proper instructions. well, see the man page for: git-remote add ... But maybe Niv could spell out some specific examples for the XFS trees Sigh .... Honestly you think ptools info is useful here? the original document was written to help SGI internal developers migrate from ptools to git - and given most XFS oss developers are familiar with ptools, the analogies in that doc are probably useful. But whatever we put up on the wiki for longer term reference should probably have the ptools crud stripped out. Cheers -- Mark |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | seguridad a linux-xfs, Digital |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [XFS updates] XFS development tree branch, xfs-dev, updated. v2.6.28-rc3-204-g8555dd6, xfs |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: New XFS git tree on oss.sgi.com, Russell Cattelan |
| Next by Thread: | Re: New XFS git tree on oss.sgi.com, Niv Sardi |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |