On Fri, 5 Dec 2008 02:37:39 +0100 Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > * barrier support in md-raid1 deviates from the specification at > > Documentation/block/barrier.txt. The specification says that requests > > submitted after the barrier request hit the media after the barrier > > request hits the media. The reality is that the barrier request can be > > randomly aborted and the requests submitted after it hit the media before > > the barrier request. > > Yes the spec should be probably updated. > > But also see Linus' rant from yesterday about code vs documentation. > When in doubt the code wins. Not when the fundamental design of the code is broken and trashes performance. The documented behaviour is strongly desirable. Alan |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Velociraptor drive related to the use of NCQ., Justin Piszcz |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH] fix up xfs-cmds build after the parallel-fest, Eric Sandeen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Device loses barrier support (was: Fixed patch for simple barriers.), Andi Kleen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Device loses barrier support (was: Fixed patch for simple barriers.), Andi Kleen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |