xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFS breakage on m68k (was: Re: linux-next: Tree for December 3)

To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: XFS breakage on m68k (was: Re: linux-next: Tree for December 3)
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 14:23:27 +0100
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>, Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@xxxxxxx>, linux-next@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20081204125006.GA13411@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20081203183602.c06f8c39.sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0812040956370.10635@anakin> <20081204121330.GA18815@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20081204234603.b5a28cd6.sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20081204125006.GA13411@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 07:50:06AM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Yeah, but Niv fixed it up and the correct version is not in the xfs git
> tree.

Hah, he noticed the bug but the wrong version got checked in anyway.

Here's the fix (for todays xfs tree):

-- 

[XFS] Fix compile with CONFIG_COMPAT enabled


Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>

Index: xfs/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_ioctl.h
===================================================================
--- xfs.orig/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_ioctl.h       2008-12-04 14:19:32.000000000 
+0100
+++ xfs/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_ioctl.h    2008-12-04 14:19:38.000000000 +0100
@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ xfs_file_compat_ioctl(
        unsigned long           arg);
 
 extern long
-xfs_file_compat_ioctl_invis(
+xfs_file_compat_invis_ioctl(
        struct file             *file,
        unsigned int            cmd,
        unsigned long           arg);

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>