| To: | Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS breakage on m68k (was: Re: linux-next: Tree for December 3) |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 4 Dec 2008 07:50:06 -0500 |
| Cc: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>, Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@xxxxxxx>, linux-next@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20081204234603.b5a28cd6.sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20081203183602.c06f8c39.sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0812040956370.10635@anakin> <20081204121330.GA18815@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20081204234603.b5a28cd6.sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 11:46:03PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_file.c:365: error: 'xfs_file_compat_invis_ioctl' > undeclared here (not in a function) > > Eric mentioned that your patch "had a problem of its own", so I assumed > that was it and left it removed from today's linux-next. Yeah, but Niv fixed it up and the correct version is not in the xfs git tree. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [patch 12/22] kill dead inode flags, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XFS breakage on m68k (was: Re: linux-next: Tree for December 3), Stephen Rothwell |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS breakage on m68k (was: Re: linux-next: Tree for December 3), Stephen Rothwell |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS breakage on m68k (was: Re: linux-next: Tree for December 3), Christoph Hellwig |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |