xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: New XFS git tree on oss.sgi.com

To: Niv Sardi <xaiki@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: New XFS git tree on oss.sgi.com
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 07:34:08 -0500
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <871vwo95fr.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <492BA7AD.5080007@xxxxxxx> <20081125140553.GA16553@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <492CA245.3000709@xxxxxxx> <20081126032710.GA19523@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <ncctz9llxzq.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20081203130414.GB9681@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <871vwo95fr.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 10:58:48AM +1100, Niv Sardi wrote:
> Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 02:48:57PM +1100, Niv Sardi wrote:
> >
> >> > Also
> >> > http://oss.sgi.com/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=xfs/xfs.git;a=commitdiff;h=ca830fdf6231d0683f4ea4e9223e234c3a509063doesn't
> >> >  seem to be needed.  None of those symbols seems to be used by
> >> > either dmapi or xfsidbg, the only two modules using xfs symbols in the
> >> > tree.
> >> 
> >> That's exactly why it's there, the revertion is actually moving from
> >> what was in ptools to something sane.
> >
> > ??  The commit above adds tons of unused exports.  But hey, I'll just
> > submit a patch to sort it out when I get some time..
> 
> Yes, I already did that ???that's the previous commit??? but Lachland wanted
> the tree not too move too much at first.
> The patch you want is the exact revert of the commit you pointed out,
> it'll be checked in soon.

Ah, makes sense.  Thanks for the clarification.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>