| To: | Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS breakage on m68k (was: Re: linux-next: Tree for December 3) |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 4 Dec 2008 07:13:30 -0500 |
| Cc: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>, Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@xxxxxxx>, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-next@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.64.0812040956370.10635@anakin> |
| References: | <20081203183602.c06f8c39.sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0812040956370.10635@anakin> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 10:02:15AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Wed, 3 Dec 2008, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Status of my local build tests will be at > > http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/linux-next . If maintainers want to give > > advice about cross compilers/configs that work, we are always open to add > > more builds. > > On m68k (32-bit only, no compat32), XFS fails to build in linux-next: Yeah, it's broken on all 32bit platforms. Today's xfs tree has a fix for it. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | XFS breakage on m68k (was: Re: linux-next: Tree for December 3), Geert Uytterhoeven |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: 2.6.27.7 vanilla, project quota enabled and process stuck in D state (repeatable every time), Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | XFS breakage on m68k (was: Re: linux-next: Tree for December 3), Geert Uytterhoeven |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS breakage on m68k (was: Re: linux-next: Tree for December 3), Stephen Rothwell |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |