[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 0/9] CRC support for superblock, ag headers, log and btree bl

To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] CRC support for superblock, ag headers, log and btree blocks
From: "Bill O'Donnell" <billodo@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 18:19:40 -0600
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20081203104409.GA15485@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20080925225613.GA9822@xxxxxx> <20081201231005.GA17631@xxxxxxx> <20081203104409.GA15485@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09)
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 05:44:09AM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
| On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 05:10:05PM -0600, Bill O'Donnell wrote:
| > On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 12:56:13AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
| > | Here's an updated crc series for various metadata structures.  We're still
| > | looking at the magic number in the log recovery case because getting down
| > | a buffer type for the other structures wasn't quite as easy as for the
| > | btree block.  I'll probably look into that again once we're done with all
| > | data structures.
| > 
| > Just to be clear, crc only applies to the metadata structures listed in the
| > subject line, correct?  It wasn't clear to me where you were with the "other
| > structures".  Maybe it would be more clear if you could provide a simple
| > table listing the structures and whether or not crc applies (yet).
| The patchset sent applies to
| sb
| agi
| agf
| btree_block
| log buffer
| next patchset later this week will add the inode

OK, thanks Christoph-
I'll look for it later in the week.
BTW, there seems to be some aliasing issue with xfs-oss list
at least with my mailer. I dunno, but its converting  
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx into xfs@xxxxxxxx  The upshot is that although you 
cc'd the list in your replies to my posts, those replies aren't
getting posted.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>