xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [XFS updates] XFS public tree - master for latest XFS changes for ma

To: Niv Sardi <xaiki@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [XFS updates] XFS public tree - master for latest XFS changes for mainline, xfs-dev like master with kdb/dmapi branch, master, updated. v2.6.28-rc3-1049-g0924b58
From: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 17:49:49 +1100
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <200812010015.mB10F1Ab031727@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Mail-followup-to: Niv Sardi <xaiki@xxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
References: <200812010015.mB10F1Ab031727@xxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 06:15:01PM -0600, Niv Sardi wrote:
> - Log -----------------------------------------------------------------
> commit 0924b585fc49bf371bc700c23e516a538bf589af
> Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date:   Fri Nov 28 14:23:34 2008 +1100
> 
>     [XFS] fix uninitialised variable bug in dquot release.
>     
>     gcc is warning about an uninitialised variable in xfs_growfs_rt().
>     This is a false positive. Fix it by changing the scope of the
>     transaction pointer to wholly within the internal loop inside
>     the function.

The title of that doesn't match the description. I think it
was supposed to be:

[PATCH 4/5] XFS: fix spurious uninitialised variable warning in xfs_growfs_rt

BTW, can we get a one-line summary of the commits being referenced
in the message? The commit hash is less than useful, and having to
read through several hundred lines of commit logs to determine
what was checked in is not fun.....

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>