xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Hi! I've noticed that kernel.org advertises 2.6.28 as "The latest st

To: Igor Podlesny <for.poige+linux@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Hi! I've noticed that kernel.org advertises 2.6.28 as "The latest stable version of the Linux kernel is".
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 04:21:24 -0500
Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <43d009740812282139x7597aafbn4474455c1aa1e0e8@mail.gmail.com>
References: <43d009740812282139x7597aafbn4474455c1aa1e0e8@mail.gmail.com>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 12:39:55PM +0700, Igor Podlesny wrote:
> -- Copying several rather big files (~ 25--45 GiB) from XFS on LVM-2
> on MDraid partition to another one, I had the system rebooted both
> with 2.6.28 and 2.6.27.10 (accomplished using 2.6.24.7-rt(sic!)25). As
> you probably understand, that's the case you even can't trace where's
> the problem, at least on a desktop with GUI, not on server with plain
> text display. Although, I'm afraid even text display wouldn't had a
> chance to show anything, tracing that problem.

You don't have 4K_STACKs enabled by default, do you? 

And instead of these rants bug reports would be more useful.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>