| To: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 00/20] xfs-cmds staging tree |
| From: | Mark Goodwin <markgw@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 23 Dec 2008 07:33:55 +1100 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20081222163831.755809000@bombadil.infradead.org> |
| Organization: | SGI Engineering |
| References: | <20081222163831.755809000@bombadil.infradead.org> |
| Reply-to: | markgw@xxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (Windows/20081105) |
|
Christoph Hellwig wrote: This is the staging tree of xfs patches. Given that Barry is gone now it seem like no one cares about userspace and I'll play patch monkey for now.
Anyone have a reason not to keep all of this together in the one tree? I guess we'd need branches for 'master' (aka dev) and 'stable' or something ..? Cheers -- Mark |
| Previous by Date: | Re: xfstests testcase 111: Infinite xfs_bulkstat bad-inode loop casefrom Roger Willcocks, Roger Willcocks |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 00/20] xfs-cmds staging tree, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 20/20] xfsprogs: resync libxfs with the kernel code, Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 00/20] xfs-cmds staging tree, Christoph Hellwig |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |