| To: | Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@xxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [xfs-masters] [PATCH][RFC] fs: Add new pre-allocation ioctls to vfs for compatibility with legacy xfs ioctls |
| From: | Ankit Jain <me@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 18 Dec 2008 15:20:29 +0530 |
| Cc: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, joel.becker@xxxxxxxxxx, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs-masters@xxxxxxxxxxx, Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, ocfs2-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20081217211550.GF8791@wotan.suse.de> |
| References: | <49460F88.2080408@ankitjain.org> <20081217202815.GE8791@wotan.suse.de> <494969C6.4090500@sandeen.net> <20081217211550.GF8791@wotan.suse.de> |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (X11/20081112) |
Mark Fasheh wrote: > On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 03:06:14PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote: > > Actually, yeah agreed - I take that back. Old users are already getting them > from file system headers, new ones should use fallocate. So there's no need > to expose the ioctls to userspace, at least not if all we're talking about > is the RESVP ioctls. Makes sense. So I can just keep them in falloc.h in a #ifdef __KERNEL__ ? Or should this be in a new ioctl.h ? -Ankit > --Mark > > -- > Mark Fasheh |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: 12x performance drop on md/linux+sw raid1 due to barriers [xfs], Leon Woestenberg |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH][RFC] fs: Add new pre-allocation ioctls to vfs for compatibility with legacy xfs ioctls, Ankit Jain |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [xfs-masters] [PATCH][RFC] fs: Add new pre-allocation ioctls to vfs for compatibility with legacy xfs ioctls, Mark Fasheh |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH][RFC] fs: Add new pre-allocation ioctls to vfs for compatibility with legacy xfs ioctls, Ankit Jain |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |